I was watching some good old Mike Mozart with JeepersMedia on Youtube. I've enjoyed alot of his work; so I decided to watch his videos right from the start - and I came across a really good one. You see, he really does tell the future! If you've seen all four Shrek movies; you'll know what I'm getting at. If you watch the first and fourth in comparison you'll go; 'yeah. The first was better'. Because once a show gets to the third remake, it just tends to go downhill from there!
In the video, he has not yet seen the third movie, but knows from the 'Shrek Triplet' activity going on in WAL-MART at the time, that Shrek has kids. And he's completely correct in saying Shrek shouldn't have kids! Well, it's true. But then, after falling in love at the end of the first movie, he's already losing his ogre-y touch! And I hate to say it - because EVERYONE loves the second movie - but if you think about it, he's just getting worse durind the second movie. It goes from ogre to sappy to marraige to sappy to kids to sappy to (the worst of all) the fourth movie. And this guy Mike Mozart, already knows it'll happen before the third movie even comes out! So, just click on the link below to see his video and also comment because I'll be interested to see others views on the Shrek franchise so far. Does everyone think it went on just a bit too long? Or he would've lasted longer without kids?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqrW-eXh6AM
Before I go I just have a question for you all. The word effect - it definitly starts with an 'e', right? Our geography teacher has an interactive whiteboard, so Microsoft Word can be projected in front of the entire class whilst she types. Anyway. She spells effects 'affects' because that's how most would pronounce it. Is it definitely spelt effects, because wouldn't Microsoft word have a little red squiggle underneath to highlight it; if it was a mistake? Just saying.
No comments:
Post a Comment